Right To Education Essay In India


Education is the most potent mechanism for the advancement of human beings. It enlarges, enriches and improves the individual's image of the future. A man without education is no more than an animal.

Education emancipates the human beings and leads to liberation from ignorance. According to Pestalozzi, education is a constant process of development of innate powers of man which are natural, harmonious and progressive. It is said that in the Twenty First Century, 'a nation's ability to convert knowledge into wealth and social good through the process of innovation is going to determine its future,' accordingly twenty first century is termed as century of knowledge .
The significance of education was very well explained in case of Brown V Board of Education , in following words: "It is the very foundation of good citizenship. Today, it is principal instrument in awakening the child to cultural value, in preparing him for later professional training and in helping him to adjust normally to his environment. "It is said that child is the future of nation.

The quality of education of the child will determine the quality of life in nation. As it is well illustrated in following words:
"In ancient shadows and twilights Where childhood had strayed, The world's great sorrows were born And its heroes were made. In the lost boyhood of Christ was betrayed. " Both at national and International levels efforts are being made to educate more and more people as education contributes in the development of the society which is consistent with the dignity of the human being.

International cooperation related to what is now called 'the right to education' has a more limited history. A private organisation, the International Bureau of Education, was established in Geneva in 1924 and was transformed into an inter-governmental organization in 1929 as an international coordinating centre for institutions concerned with education. A much broader approach was chosen, however with the establishment of UNESCO in 1945. United Nations, on 10th December, 1998 adopted Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Preamble to the UDHR stated that: every individual and organ of society...., shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms...." In accordance with the Preamble of UDHR, education should aim at promoting human rights by importing knowledge and skill among the people of the nation states.

Article 26 (1) of UDHR proclaims that: Every one has a right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit."

Article 26 (2) states that Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for maintenance of peace. Further, Article 26 (3) provides that parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children."

The right to education has also been recognized by the International covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Article 13

(1) states that,: The states parties to the present covenant recognize the right of everyone to education. They agree that education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and sense of its dignity, and shall strengthen the respect for human right and fundamental freedoms.... Article 13
 (2) further provides that the states Parties to the present covenant recognize that, with a view to achieving the full realization of this right:
(a) Primary education shall be compulsory and available free to all;
(b) Secondary education in its different forms, including technical and vocational secondary education, shall be made generally available and accessible to all by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education;
(c) Higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means, and in particular by the
progressive introduction of free education;
(d) Fundamental education shall be encouraged or intensified as far as possible for those persons who have not received on completed the whole period of their primary education;
(e) The development of a system of schools at all levels shall be actively pursued, an adequate fellowship system shall be established, and the material conditions of teaching staff shall be continuously improved.

During the general discussion by the committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights on the right to education (1998), an agreement was reached that four elements define its core content:
(1) No one shall be denied a right to education;
(2) Everyone is entitled to basic (primary) education in one form or another; this includes basic education for adults. Primary education must be compulsory and free. No one may withhold a child from primary education. A state has an obligation to protect this right from encroachment by third persons;
(3) The minorities have the right to be taught in the language of their choice, in institutions outside the official system of public education. UNESCO has adopted a number of normative documents, conventions and recommendations ensuring the enjoyment of the right to education for everyone.

The best known among these is the Convention against Discrimination in Education, which was adopted on 14th December 1960 by the General Conference and which entered into force in 1962. The role of international organisation regarding the implementation of the right to education is just not limited to the preparation of documents and conducting conferences and conventions but it also undertakes the operational programmes assuring, access to education of refugees, migrants, minorities, indigenous people, women and the handicaps. India participated in the drafting of the Declaration and has ratified the covenant; Hence India is under obligation to implement such provisions.

The Founder Fathers of the nation recognizing the importance and significance of right to education made it a constitutional goal, and placed it under chapter IV Directive Principle of State Policy of the Constitution of India. Article 45 of the Constitution requires state to make provisions within 10 years for free and compulsory education for all children until they complete the age of 14 years.

Further Article 46 declares that the state shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker section of the people.... It is significant to note that among several Articles enshrined under Part IV of the Indian Constitution, Article 45 had been given much importance as education is the basic necessary of the democracy and if the people are denied their right to education then democracy will be paralyzed; and it was, therefore, emphasized that the objective enshrined under Article 45 in Chapter IV of the Constitution should be achieved within ten years of the adoption of the Constitution. By establishing the obligations of the state the Founder Fathers made it the responsibility of coming governments to formulate a programme in order to achieve the given goals, but unresponsive and sluggish attitude of the government to achieve the objective enshrined under Article 45 belied the hopes and aspirations of the people. However, the Judiciary showed keen interest in providing free and compulsory education to all the children below the age of fourteen years.

In case of Mohini Jain V State of Karnataka, the Supreme Court held that right to education is fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The right to education springs from right to life. The right to life under Article 21 and the dignity of the individual cannot fully be appreciated without the enjoyment of right to education. The Court observed:
# Right to life is compendious expression for all those rights which the Courts must enforce because they are basic to the dignified enjoyment of life. It extends to the fully range of conduct which the individual is free to pursue. .... The right to life under Article 21 and the dignity of the individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education. The State Government is under an obligation to provide educational facilities at all levels to its citizens.
In case of Unni Krishan V State of Andhra Pradesh the Supreme Court was asked to examine the decision of Mohini Jain's case. In the present case the Apex Court partly overruled given in the Mohini Jain case. The Court held that, the right to education is implicit in the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21 and must be interpreted in the light of the Directive Principle of State Policy contained in Articles 41, 45 and 46.

The Apex Court, however, limited the State obligation to provide educational facilities as follows.
(i) Every Citizen of this Country has a right to free education until he completes the age of fourteen years;
(ii) Beyond that stage, his right to education is subject to the limits of the economic capacity of the state.

Further the Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta V State of Tamil Nadu the Supreme Court observed that, to develop the full potential of the children they should be prohibited to do hazardous work and education should be made available to them. In this regard the Court held that, the government should formulate programme offering job oriented education so that they may get education and the timings be so adjusted so that their employment is should not be affected. Again in Bandhua Muti Morcha V Union of India, Justice K. Ramaswamy and Justice Sagir Ahmad, observed, illiteracy has many adverse effects in a democracy governed by rule of law. Educated citizens could meaningfully exercise his political rights, discharge social responsibilities satisfactorily and develop sprit of tolerance and reform.

Therefore, education is compulsory.., compulsory education is one of the states for stability of democracy, social integration and to eliminate social evils." The Supreme Court by rightly and harmoniously construing the provision of Part III and IV of the constitution has made right to education a basic fundamental right.
The Government of India by Constitutional (86th Amendment Act) Act, 2002 had added a new Article 21A which provides that "the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 6 to 14 years as the state may, by law determine". And further strengthened this Article 21A by adding clause (K) to Article 51-A which provides who is a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his child or ward between the age of 6 and 14 years. On the basis of Constitutional mandate provided in Article 41, 45, 46, 21A and various judgments of Supreme Court the Government of India has taken several steps to eradicate illiteracy, improvement the quality of education and make children back to school who left the school for one or the reasons. Some of these programmes are National Technology Mission, District Primary Education Programme, and Nutrition Support for Primary Education, National Open School, Mid- Day Meal Scheme, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan and other state specific initiatives. Besides, this several states have enacted legislation to provide free and compulsory primary education such as- the Kerala Education Act 1959, the Punjab Primary Education Act 1960, the Gujarat Compulsory Primary Education Act 1961, U.P. Basic Education Act 1972, Rajasthan Primary Education Act 1964, etc.

However, the Constitution of India and Supreme Court have declared that the education is now a fundamental right of the people of India, but it does not speak about millions of children who are in the age group of 0-5 years. It is needed that the Constitution should again be amended and the children of age group of 0 -5 years should be included; as by the time the child reaches the age of 6 years he/she gets in to the child labour due to the poverty. Moreover the Constitution only ensures that the state shall provide primary education to the children up to the age of 14 years, and the secondary and higher education is contingent and conditional upon the economic capacity of the state. The right to education will be meaningful only and only if the all the levels education reaches to all the sections of the people otherwise it will fail to achieve the target set out by our Founder Father to make Indian society an egalitarian society.

More Articles:
Legal Education and Its Aims
Reservation in Educational Institution
Education: A Fundamental Right in India
Moral Education necessary part of the Education
Impact of Globalization on Legal Education In India
Legal Education To Meet Challenges of Globalization
Higher Education in India: From Socialism to Capitalism
The Role of Education Sector in Removing Gender Inequality
Fee Structure vis-a-vis Private Unaided Educational Institutions
Granting Cultural And Education Rights To The Minority In India
Ragging In Educational Institutes: A Human Rights Perspective

The author can be reached at: vijaypalsingh3@legalserviceindia.com / Print This Article

The Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009 empowers children belonging to the backward section of the economy to free and compulsory education. The Right to Education Act was earlier termed as The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act came into function after Gopal Krishna Gokhale’s famous impassionate plea to the Imperial Legislative Council for introducing free and compulsory primary education throughout India. The Right to Education Act made compulsory all government and private sector schools across India to provide 25 percent reservation to children between the age group of 6 and 14 belonging to the weaker section of the country access to free and compulsory education. India became one of the 135 countries to make education a fundamental right of every child, when the act finally came into practice in April 2010.

 

History

A rough version of the draft was first prepared in the year 2005. It was met with a lot of criticism because of the large percentage of reservation made mandatory across all schools for the unprivileged children. However, the Central Advisory Board of Education, who were founders of the draft stood ground and justified the 25percent reservation as a definite requisite to become a democratic and egalitarian society.

 

Time frame:

    Bill approved by the cabinet on 2 July, 2009
    Bill passed by the Rajya Sabha on 20 July, 2009
    Bill passed by the Lok Sabha on 4 August, 2009
    Received Presidential approval and made into a law on 26 August, 2009
    The law came to effect on 1 April, 2010, (except for the state of J&K), by Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh

 

Milestone

The Right to education Act is a fundamental right which allows every child between the age group of 6 to 14 to have access to free and fare education. It requires all private and government schools to reserve 25 percent of the seats for children belonging to weaker sections of the society. The act also separates the fraudulent schools and donations and concessions have been rolled back. The act also states that no child shall be expelled, held back or required to pass a board examination until the completion of elementary education. There is also a special training of school drop-outs to bring them up at par with students of the same age.


The Right to Education act stretches to 18 years of coverage for children with disabilities, and other provisions covered in the act range from infrastructure development, teacher-student ratio and faculty are mentioned in the act. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights is an autonomous body set up to monitor the implementation of the act along with commissions set up by the States. The body in question was formed in the year 2007

 

Implementation & Funding

The Right to Education act has clearly laid down distinct responsibilities for the centre, state and local bodies for its implementation. However, a lot of states have been complaining about the lack of funds being received which is making it impossible to meet with the appropriate standard of education in the schools needed for universal education. Hence, the centre that is at the receiving end of the revenue will have to subsidize for the states.


A committee set up to study the fund requirement for the implementation of the act estimated an initial capital requirement of approximately Rs. 171000 crores or 1.71 trillion over 5 years, and in April 2010 the Indian government agreed to share the funding of the price at a ratio of 65 to 35 between the centre and the state and a ratio of 90 to 10 for the Northeastern states. Later the principal amount was then increased to Rs. 231000 crores and the centre agreed to raise its share to 68%. However there is much debate on this. Another important development in 2011 was to further stretch the act and implement it till the preschool age range, hence the age ceiling would rise from 14 years now to 16 years and would cover till class 10. . However this is under talks.


Anniversary

On completion of one year a report was released by the Human Resource Development ministry, which did not reflect happy numbers. The report admits that 8.1 million children in the age group of 4 to 16 remained out of school; there is a shortage of over 508000 teachers’ country wide. And there were several key legal commitments that were falling out of schedule. The Supreme Court of India also intervened to see the just implementation of the Right to Education Act in the Northeast States.


Criticism

The Right to education act has met with a lot of criticism such as being called a draft that was hastily prepared, there was not much consultation made on the quality of education, on excluding children under the 6 year age range. Many of the schemes have been compared to that of the Sarva Sikhsha Abhivan and DPEP of the 90’s which was criticized for being ineffective and corrupted. The  Right to Education Act also seems to have left out the orphans, since during the time of admission a lot of documents are required, like that of birth certificate, BPL certificates and the orphans deprived of such documents  are not eligible to apply.

0 Thoughts to “Right To Education Essay In India

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *