The use of mobile phones in public places is as antisocial a smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places, so mobile phones should be banned in the same way. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Band 8 essay sample
Mobile phones have become an integral part of our lives but they become a nuisance when they are used in public places. Just like smoking is banned in public places, some people feel that mobile phones too should be banned. I agree with this view and I personally believe that this move will make our public places a lot more peaceful.
There are several detriments to mobile phone usage at public places. Firstly, mobile phones radiations can cause damage to the brain and the heart of the user. Secondly, the ringtones and the speaking on the phone make disturbances in public transport, parks and cinemas. Finally, mobile phone thefts have become a growing crime in crowded places. It is evident that because of the public use of mobile phones, many people lose their expensive handsets and also become mentally disturbed.
There are many more reasons to restrict the use of mobile phones in public places. In places like hospitals, libraries and devotional centres mobile phones cause a great deal of distraction. In schools and universities, students can send messages, videos and music on cellular phones while the teacher teaches the lessons in the classrooms. There is yet another argument for banning mobile phones from public places. Some perverts take obscene pictures or videos from beaches, playgrounds or swimming pools on their mobile phones.
In conclusion, mobile phones are certainly a great innovation, but they are also a distraction and a nuisance and therefore, in my opinion, they should be banned from public places.
Ring, ring… These days, it's almost impossible to catch a movie or grab a bite to eat at a restaurant without having the experience interrupted by the sound of a cell phone ringing.
"Sometimes I go into a restaurant and I want to enjoy a meal or coffee and quietly read, and someone begins talking really loud on their cell phone. It's obnoxious," said Oakland, Calif., resident Charles Crowder.
With more than 100 million cell phones worldwide and growing, the problem is likely to get worse. In the United States alone, it's estimated that in five years 84 percent of U.S. citizens will have a mobile phone.
But a backlash against the cellular nuisance has already begun. In restaurants across the United States, signs asking diners to turn off their phones are becoming increasingly common. In Maine's Baxter State Park, mobile phones are illegal except for emergencies. The resistance has even reached the White House: President Bush has reportedly banned cell phones from staff meetings.
In fact, several governments across the world are now considering imposing etiquette on mobile gabbers in public spaces by legalizing technology that blocks cellular signals.
Quit Your Yapping
Cell phone jammers have been around since 1998. The devices, which cost around $1,000, can block signals in a room about the size of a movie theater. The jammer sends out a low-power, encoded radio signal or modulated radio wave.
Jammers work in one of two ways. Some devices set their signal to the same frequency as pagers and mobile phones, cutting off communication between handsets and base stations. Others work as electronic filters that fool mobile phones into thinking there are no frequencies available to make or receive calls. Manufacturers of the devices say the jamming only affects the designated area (most radii are a couple dozen to several hundred feet) and works only on cellular transmissions.
Sounds like the perfect solution to pesky phones, right? The problem is, except for Israel and Japan, cell phone jammers remain illegal in most developed countries, including the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Switzerland, and Australia.
The tide, however, may be changing. This past spring, both Hong Kong and Canada announced they would consider legalizing jammers in an effort to curb bad phone behavior in public. Around the same time, the leaders of India's parliament revealed they had already installed the devices to avoid interruptions during sessions.
Coming to a Theater Near You?
Bringing jamming devices to the United States might prove trickier. The 1934 Telecommunications Act makes it illegal to inhibit the use of public airwaves, which is exactly what jammers do. In 2000, the Federal Communications Commission affirmed this ban on jammers. Only an act of Congress could change that.
But as public resentment of chirping disturbances continues to grow, such a major change in the legal landscape becomes less far-fetched. Last year, Letstalk.com found that 57 percent of Americans favor barring cell phones from restaurants, theaters, and other public places.
The U.S. cellular industry, however, is likely to continue to fight jammers tooth and nail.
"The technology is illegal in the U.S., and it's our position that it should be," said Travis Larson, spokesman for the Cellular Telephone Industry Association (CTIA), based in Washington.
According to Larson, jammers put lives at risk by hindering a hospital's ability to page doctors at dinner or blocking emergency calls, for example. Each day, he notes, more than 118,000 emergency calls are made from cell phones.
Rather than relying on new technology, a better solution to the cell phone nuisance may lie in promoting old-fashioned manners, Larson said. CTIA and many of its member companies, including mobile phone manufacturer Nokia and service provider US Cellular, are pouring money into public education campaigns to encourage cell phone users to be more considerate.
"The answer is etiquette, education, making sure people are using their cell phones in ways that don't invade other people's space," Larson said.