Outline For Essay On Corruption In The Philippines

Even if only half of the allegations against her turn out to be true, Janet Lim-Napoles, the supposed brain behind the mind-boggling pork barrel scam that is the subject of ongoing Inquirer reports, would easily qualify as the country’s foremost expert on corruption. The elaborate scheme attributed to her presumes an intimate grasp of the workings of the political system that no Filipino scholar has ever fully documented. Napoles appears to have explored the weakest links of government and seen the vulnerabilities of officials at various levels. But, instead of writing a doctoral thesis or book on the topic, she has used this knowledge to build a lucrative business.

Should she ever land in prison and need a benign intellectual pursuit to keep her active mind at work, I would recommend that she consider writing a participant-observer account of the social system of corruption. I would be happy to offer advice on the theoretical framework. A working title for her thesis might be: “Politics and the function of corruption: How the pork barrel works.” The aim of the study would be to bring out the background assumptions implicit in the way the JLN group of companies navigated the murky waters of government. Such research would help transitional societies like ours find effective antidotes to the scourge of corruption in public service.

I would begin with the hypothesis that the pork barrel, which goes by the pretentious name Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF), is really nothing more than a bribe to the legislators who hold the power to approve the national budget. This concession can take many forms and go by other names like “congressional initiatives.” But the basic idea is the same: to provide congressmen and senators the means to cater to the specific needs of their constituencies, and, if they wish, to recoup part of what they spend during elections.

This seemingly irrational feature of the political system proceeds from the recognition that in a society where material deprivation and lack of access to services continue to be the lot of the many, legislators find themselves having to attend to the personal needs of their constituents. This is not their function yet it is what makes running for office very costly. The lack of differentiation between government and politics per se precisely casts them in the role of overall patrons, well beyond the function of lawmaking. Lawmaking becomes, for many of them, no more than a peripheral chore. In such settings, one might as well replace Congress with a small commission of full-time professional experts on policy and law to work on legislation. But that would go against the tenets of representative democracy.

As I have previously said in this column, voters, in general, are not averse to the idea of giving their representatives the right to identify pet or priority projects. What they object to is the waste and misappropriation of public funds that typically result from the exercise of this power. The pork barrel scam to which the Napoles network is linked shows that corruption thrives where discretion is broad and no clear assignment of accountability exists.

As expected, legislators who were among the clients of the JLN group of companies deny any responsibility for the implementation and monitoring of the projects they identified for funding. The implementing agencies, on the other hand, claim they are only the channel for the release of the funds and point to the local governments as the answerable units. The latter, in turn, assert that the responsibility lies with the NGOs who are commissioned to deliver the goods and services. For their part, the NGOs claim they delivered the goods to the listed beneficiaries, but it is not their fault if these are fictitious.

One can imagine how much grease money is dispensed at every point in this chain of corruption. Yet, no one can easily be held accountable, except the lowest clerks in the totem pole of government who received the project proposals. The profitable business model that Napoles has explicitly designed for this environment is easy to replicate, but developing the key contacts in every office may take more time. It is thus not a surprise that it was the Napoles associates—Benhur K. Luy and Merlina P. Suñas—who emerged as the whistle-blowers in this case. Napoles says that they turned against her after she stopped them from striking out on their own.

Obviously, this problem will not go away with the elimination of one syndicate. It’s almost certain there are other operators out there that are lying low for now, waiting for the issue to die down. Their modus operandi is woven around the same assumptions about our political system, namely: that there is big money to be made from government, that every public official has a price, that everyone is on the take or complicit, and that even as investigations are launched to placate public anger, no one actually goes to jail unless they pose a political threat.

The main argument of this imaginary thesis would be that a political system like ours incorporates corruption into its operations as a condition for its maintenance. In short, corruption is functional to the system. The system’s default is to reproduce itself. Nothing will compel it to change except persistent pressure from outside the system. If the other institutional systems—the mass media, the Church, the economic system, the law, etc.—can generate enough noise and irritation over its performance, the political system will have no choice but to pause, reflect and reform.

public.lives@gmail.com

Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: congress, corruption, Government, Janet Lim-Napoles, pork barrel

For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Political Corruption: Comparison of South Korea and the Philippines

Although corruption is a universal problem, today we often hear about corruption in developing countries. If western countries are more or less successful in their fight against corruption, Asian countries cannot boast of the same results. There are no doubts that corruption is a global issue and fight against it is a necessity, if people want to live in a stable and prosperous world. However, attitude and approach to this issue can be rather different. In terms of this paper we would like to discuss two Asian countries, South Korea and the Philippines. We will compare and contrast their experience in fight against corruption.

It is essential to mention that in terms of this paper, we will discuss political corruption. Although, corruption can exist in absolutely different life spheres, surveys show that the majority of people are convinced that the most corrupt sphere of life is policy. Members of political parties, parliamentarians and those who work in the sphere of police and other judiciary organizations do not call for faith of ordinary people.

Today, the Republic of Philippines is one of the most corrupt countries not only in Asia, but in the whole world. At present time the situation with corruption is extremely acute. Today, the Republic of Philippines is associated with crime, corruption and economic instability. Although several decades ago the Philippines was a powerful economic country, at present due to the corruption, it became an outsider of Asian world. The situation is extremely acute and the country undergoes a great crisis with perpetual corrupt scandals. Because of corruption, the Philippines became a country of poor economics, absence of freedoms and rights.

Although , just like in many other countries, corruption in the Philippines existed all the time, at present the situation is the most horrible. At the time when other countries understand the necessity to fight corruption, it continuous to grow and prosper in the Philippines.

Luckily, the situation with corruption differs in other countries. South Korea can serve as an interesting example of the fact that corruption can be eliminated. About a decade ago it was hard to imagine more corrupt country than South Korea. However, tremendous changes in political and finance regime allowed to pull the country out of the corrupt slough. Restriction of finance practices by political parties allowed to fight corruption in the country and today South Korea's experience is an inspiring example that corruption can be won.

0 Thoughts to “Outline For Essay On Corruption In The Philippines

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *