Mississippi Burning is a film directed by Alan Parker that was released in 1988. It depicts the case of Mississippi Burning, which took place in 1964, where three civil rights workers went missing. The FBI was notified only to find the sheriffs office linked to the Ku Klux Klan and accountable for the disappearances of the three boys.
This film follows an investigation carried out by FBI agents into the disappearances of three civil rights workers, who campaigned for the rights of “blacks”.
As the case unfolds, vital evidence, such as the workers abandoned car are found and turmoils are faced by the main characters, Agents Anderson and Ward. The case proceeds when more FBI agents are called in and the sheriffs offices involvement is discovered. As a last resort, Ward does things Andersons way and as a result, information is received from the Deputys wife, which leads to the bodies being recovered and the men involved, charged with violating civil rights.
The film is set in the fictional town of Jessup County in Mississippi. Segregation is prominent in this town where many of the whites; live in the town, whilst the blacks; are shown living on the outskirts in rundown houses. The setting is also presented in a manner where the town is shown to be in the middle of nowhere in order to depict the belief that their crimes would go unknown due to its isolation to the higher authorities.
Mississippi Burning is a fictionalised depiction of the events in Mississippi in 1964. The movie portrays a period in history during the 1960s, where segregation and racial discrimination dominated. It was a period when civil rights movements were held to fight for the rights of “blacks” such as the Freedom Summer Movements and The Watts Riots of 1965. There was also the strong presence of racial groups such as the KKK and the corrupted authorities, who possessed great influence in those times. Many people also voiced their concerns such as Malcolm X and Martin Luther King in the struggle for their civil rights.
The film “Mississippi Burning” gives an accurate account of the 1960s; however a few discrepancies can be identified through analysis of that historical period.
In the movie, many scenes present the reminder of segregation and racial discrimination as seen in the 1960s. These include the first scene, where a contrast is shown between the two water fountains, at the restaurant, where coloureds were separated from the whites and the strong presence of the distinctive racial groups.
Some of the discrepancies identified were that there was no representations of retaliation from “blacks”, an expression that the FBI were the heroes and a stereotypical view given to all locals, which was not the case.
The film, “Mississippi Burning” contains a vast array of characters, but two main characters are Ward and Anderson, who are the FBI agents in control of this investigation.
Agent Ward, acted by William Dafoe, is the more conservative type of person. He was described by Anderson as the type that crossed the t’s, implying that Ward only knew one approach. Ward’s role in the movie was also primarily dominating as he made all the decisions such as interviewing witnesses and gathering evidence; however, it was apparent that with this approach, the case wouldn’t be solved.
William Dafoe portrayed Ward convincingly through his attire, where he was formally dressed at all times and the use of glasses to depict a compliant attitude. The way he spoke also brought about a convincing attitude where formal language was always used.
However in contrast, Agent Anderson, acted by Gene Hackman, is the type of person that does things his way. Anderson’s method was demonstrated during the film when Anderson passively scrutinised the deputy’s wife to obtain facts required for the conviction. He also orchestrated other events, for instance, the scene when the KKK members turned on each other due to Anderson causing an internal quarrel. It is obvious that if it wasn’t for Anderson, the case wouldn’t have been solved.
Gene Hackman portrayed Anderson very convincingly as his attire was always casual and his use of language depicted his aggressiveness. His stature was also related to the attitude Anderson portrayed as well as the aggressive voice that accompanied it.
“Mississippi Burning” was released by Orion Productions in 1988. At this time, segregation had been minimised in most communities and equality between races and gender were on the rise. Society had become modern where living standards and the economy had increased. The “Klan” had also gone into hiding and laws had been created in order to protect the rights of each individual no matter what race they were.
There were still the groups/individuals that were prejudice in different aspects of life. But, the majority had started to treat each other as equal whilst others were treated like heroes for their efforts such as Martin Luther King Jr who received a Nobel Peace Prize that year.
Much progress had been made since the 1960s in regards to racism, that many people saw this movie has a way to bring about awareness. Some organisation had praised it as it gave an insight into how “blacks” were treated, but still held their heads high. People also saw the film as a way to see the true extent of what life was like for a coloured during the 1960s and to understand their pain through startling images of the “Klan’s” acts.
Criticism was also expressed towards the film as many critics claimed that the “blacks” had been portrayed as helpless scared people who didn’t help the civil rights struggle, but instead, needed whites to come to their aid. Critics also fault the film, for not representing the “blacks” who played vital roles and also for the stereotyping of all Mississippians as racists.
Throughout the film, the angle of a low angle shot has been extensively used to convey certain moods and emotions. This technique consists of positioning the camera below the figure, in order to obtain a particular effect. The low angle shot was used in the film to show power and vulnerability such as in the scene when the burning cross was shown where it illustrated the powerful symbol of the cross and the supremacy it had.
The shot of the extreme close up was also used where a close up was given of an object. This technique was primarily used to display qualities of a person and the expressions manifested on their faces. An occurrence in the film was just before Frank shot the civil rights workers, where a close up of his face was portrayed. This was done in order to depict his expressionless face and the way he had no remorse for his actions.
A lot of emphasis was also put into the lighting used in order to create a specific atmosphere. During the film, backlight was used create an eerie atmosphere as well as suspense due to the lack of light. This occurred in the scene when Lester was attacked in order to create a sense of anticipation as well as the kidnapping of he mayor.
Lastly, the technique of sound was also used where diegetic and non-diegitic sounds were used. These types of sounds included voices, where as non-diegetic sounds covered mood music. This technique was expressed during many scenes in order to set the tone such as when the characters were speaking and the mood music of gospel singing being used. This gospel singing was used to create the sad and sombre atmosphere and to also engage the viewer’s emotions.
Overall, this movie was a clear depiction of the events in the 1960s and is a successful text in keeping this history alive through the passing to future generations.
Essay on Mississippi Burning
Mississippi Burning takes place exactly where the title says, Mississippi. The year is 1964 in a small country town named Jessup. Since it’s the South, blacks are treated like they are a step below the normal man. This entire film is about a missing person case that two FBI agents come to investigate. They get swept up in something much bigger than what they came for.
When three civil rights representatives, two whites and a black boy, come into town and set up a voting both, the white town’s folk burn it down. The three kids are driving away when they find out they are being followed. After a few rear endings they turn down a side road, and the car behind turns on its lights. It was a cop car along with two other trucks. The boys stop and the Deputy, Clinton Pell, and the sheriff Mr. Stucking, come up to them and spoke first. Another man, Frank Baily, comes to the window. He is a very scary and strong looking man who hates blacks. He mouths off a few racial words then pulls a gun and kills all three of them.
Our Service Can Write a Custom Essay on Mississippi Burning for You!
Later, two FBI agents come into town trying to find out what happened to the three missing people. One is a young college boy, Allan Ward, who, like you said in the FILMOGRAPHY packet, is a by the book guy. The other, Mr. Anderson, is a former Southern Sheriff. Right from the start they met with cold glances and turned backs. Allan met with the black members of the city only to get no information and bad news for the black people because they were beaten because of Allan’s talking. The Sheriff gave them a false story about the boys that seamed really fishy and did not make sense. After a little nosing around, they found out that a big KKK was in the town. Those people didn’t like the FBI agents, so they put a burning cross in the yard of their motel. Allan called in more agents to help with the case.
The KKK went on a riot after that, burning down houses and churches. The FBI found the car the kids were driving in a swamp. Allan decided to call in 100 more agents to help search the area. The event caught the attention of the nation and the press came pouring in.
The agents kept getting closer and closer to the truth, and the Klan kept getting madder and madder. After a peaceful protest for black rights, the Klan went on a rampage burning down every black home. The agents bring the Sheriff to a State trial for those incidents. The Sheriff and his Deputy are sentenced to five years in prison, but the Judge suspends it, meaning that it’s not going to happen anytime soon. The trial outrages the Klan who go on a massive killing spree.
The bodies of the three boys are found. Allan finds that he is not doing so well after a punch from Mr. Anderson, and Mr. Anderson takes over. He gets a piece of the story from the Deputy, Mr. Pall’s, wife. Hardball is the next move. They call in a “specialist” who threatens to cut off one of the clan member’s balls. He gets the whole story from him and the Agents set up a few stings to confirm. At the end, all the people who participated in the violent crime are placed behind bars, an action packed ending.
This film was made to show the treatment and unjust action towards the black community. The film was done with third person point of view, seeing and hearing everyone.
One thing that I learned from Mississippi Burning was that everyone from a town would look the other way when this happens. Nobody came forward and said anything without a fight or first saying no. If more towns were like this one, then the entire country at the time was messed up.
Another fact that I learned was that the lynch mobs would readily beat up women and children and burn down every building without a care. The third thing that I learned was even if you were white, you could still become a victim of the KKK. The two white boys where murdered before their black partner was.
Some stereotypes in this film were about FBI agents. When Allan called in the many agents, they all wore black suits and similar ties, even when they waded through water and mud. They would change clothes at least once. Another is the Mammy. She was in almost every black family shown, at least the unattractive, large and/or vocal woman portion of her.
The entire film was built around the discrimination of black people by white town’s folk. All of the lynching and house burnings are some examples along with the murder of the two white boys for being civil rights activists.
The director did a good job of making an impact in this film. He did so by portraying the Klan members beating on the helpless black people after they came out of the church. He used a lot of violent drama. This film flowed together very nicely. One thing that he could have done to this film would be to make it shorter or put something in the middle of it. I became very bored and restless after an hour or so. The movie is two hours long.
It was a good movie, not great, but good. I would give it a six out of ten.
One film technique that was used very well was the background music and noise. At the beginning, there was a black choir singing gospel songs over a burning building; and at the end was the same choir singing over a scene of a graveyard. When the convictions came up, a screen freeze captured the men as they walked hand cuffed down the Court steps and turned black and white while a black priest talked about the murder that happened in the weeks before. Another technique used is the editing. During the climax, various press interviews of the locals came into the screen. It flowed perfectly. Also, the camera was shaking during violent scenes and car chases, an added bonus.
ATTENTION!!!HotEssays.blogspot.com provides free sample essays and essay examples on any topics and subjects. EssayLib.com essay writing service produces 100% custom essays, term papers & research papers, written by quality essay writers only. The prices start from $10 per page. You can order a custom essay on Mississippi Burning now!